<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
  xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Chaos Computer Club - German OWASP Day 2026 (high quality mp4)</title>
    <link>https://media.ccc.de/c/god2026</link>
    <description> This feed contains all events from god2026 as mp4</description>
    <copyright>see video outro</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:38:21 -0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>OWASP Cornucopia - Gamifying AI Threat Modeling and Security Requirement Analysis (god2026)</title>
      <link>https://media.ccc.de/v/god2026-110763-owasp-cornucopia-gamifyin</link>
      <description>Shift-left doesn&#39;t start with scanning the code for security vulnerabilities; it begins with designing for security.

Too often, the shift-left mantra consists of implementing (AI-powered) code scanning and applying AI-powered security fixes for remediation. Also, don&#39;t forget to implement the AI-powered benchmark for AI-powered Security Fixes. Now, to be clear, I am not actually telling you to stop using these tools — if they work for you — instead, we should ask ourselves:

What are we working on?
What can go wrong?
What are we going to do about it?
Did we do a good job?

In order to support that second question in particular, we have created the next version of OWASP Cornucopia (see: https://cybersecgames.com/pages/owasp-cornucopia-threat-modeling-collection).

OWASP Cornucopia is a mechanism in the form of a card game to assist software development teams in identifying security requirements in Agile, conventional, and formal development processes. It is language, platform, and technology-agnostic.

The formerly titled &quot;Cornucopia — Ecommerce Website Edition&quot; is now &quot;Cornucopia — Website App Edition&quot;. This edition was originally created in August 2012, released as v1.0 in February 2013, and has undergone several minor updates/releases over the following ten to fifteen years. This has been substantially updated in v2.0, in which the most noticeable change was an update of the OWASP ASVS mapping from ASVS v3.0 to v4.0, together with the creation of translations into six languages (EN, ES, FR, NL, NO-NB, and PT-BR) due to the efforts of past and current volunteers.

The new version, available in 11 languages (EN, ES, FR, HI, NL, NO-NB, PT-PT, PT-BR, RU, UK), will include all new cards and text that covers all OWASP ASVS 5.0 requirements and links them to more than 200 unique common attack patterns (CAPEC). Each of the common attack patterns will have a unique set of ASVS requirements, which means that you never need to stop playing the game! You will always be able to return to the same card to discover new threats and security requirements to consider when building your software. Additionally, we are publishing the OWASP Cornucopia Companion Edition that comes with 6 companion suits (see: https://cornucopia.owasp.org/edition/companion) covering new topics: Agentic AI (AAI), Automated Threats (BOT), Cloud (CLD), Frontend (FRE), Large Language Models (LLM), and DevOps (DVO). A suit in the companion deck may replace (or be used in addition to) suites in the existing Website Edition so that the players can add a specific focus to their threat modeling: For example, say you are building an LLM application and want to perform threat modeling specifically for LLM. You would then use the OWASP Cornucopia Website Edition and the LLM companion suite as your elected OWASP Cornucopia focus area.

What&#39;s more, it is now possible to create your OWASP Cornucopia Threat Model in OWASP Threat Dragon using their brand new EoP Games diagram. The diagram allows you to easily select the right card from the OWASP Cornucopia suite and connect it directly to your threat model in OWASP Threat Dragon, thanks to the combined efforts of volunteers at Universidad Católica del Uruguay and the OWASP Threat Dragon project.

All project leaders and contributors to the OWASP projects that have provided valuable input and guidance to OWASP Top 10, OWASP AISVS and the OWASP GenAI Security project. We also want to thank the people and contributors to Mitre&#39;s Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC™) and Atlas, together with CSA Cloud Controls Matrix, which are all used in the cross-references provided.

Failing to regularly assess your security isn&#39;t only costly; it can leave you vulnerable to threats. Several companies have implemented OWASP Cornucopia as part of their SDLC and use it for security requirements analysis, threat modeling, and secure design for every sprint and every user story. You should do the same! Don&#39;t let your business spiral out of control; consciously assess how you are doing by continuously threat-modeling your applications and infrastructure. To get started scaling your threat modeling efforts, OWASP Cornucopia v3.0 is the perfect tool.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</description>
      <enclosure url="https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110763-eng-OWASP_Cornucopia_-_Gamifying_AI_Threat_Modeling_and_Security_Requirement_Analysis_hd.mp4"
        length="416372603486208"
        type="video/mp4"/>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:20:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110763-eng-OWASP_Cornucopia_-_Gamifying_AI_Threat_Modeling_and_Security_Requirement_Analysis_hd.mp4?1790246301</guid>
      <dc:identifier>af2068b9-f97b-45ed-8c07-1f3e9ae5fbd5</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2026-09-24T10:20:00+02:00</dc:date>
      <itunes:author>Johan Sydseter</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:keywords>110763, 2026, god2026, Saal Fidelitas, god2026-eng, god2026, Day 1</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:summary>Shift-left doesn&#39;t start with scanning the code for security vulnerabilities; it begins with designing for security.

Too often, the shift-left mantra consists of implementing (AI-powered) code scanning and applying AI-powered security fixes for remediation. Also, don&#39;t forget to implement the AI-powered benchmark for AI-powered Security Fixes. Now, to be clear, I am not actually telling you to stop using these tools — if they work for you — instead, we should ask ourselves:

What are we working on?
What can go wrong?
What are we going to do about it?
Did we do a good job?

In order to support that second question in particular, we have created the next version of OWASP Cornucopia (see: https://cybersecgames.com/pages/owasp-cornucopia-threat-modeling-collection).

OWASP Cornucopia is a mechanism in the form of a card game to assist software development teams in identifying security requirements in Agile, conventional, and formal development processes. It is language, platform, and technology-agnostic.

The formerly titled &quot;Cornucopia — Ecommerce Website Edition&quot; is now &quot;Cornucopia — Website App Edition&quot;. This edition was originally created in August 2012, released as v1.0 in February 2013, and has undergone several minor updates/releases over the following ten to fifteen years. This has been substantially updated in v2.0, in which the most noticeable change was an update of the OWASP ASVS mapping from ASVS v3.0 to v4.0, together with the creation of translations into six languages (EN, ES, FR, NL, NO-NB, and PT-BR) due to the efforts of past and current volunteers.

The new version, available in 11 languages (EN, ES, FR, HI, NL, NO-NB, PT-PT, PT-BR, RU, UK), will include all new cards and text that covers all OWASP ASVS 5.0 requirements and links them to more than 200 unique common attack patterns (CAPEC). Each of the common attack patterns will have a unique set of ASVS requirements, which means that you never need to stop playing the game! You will always be able to return to the same card to discover new threats and security requirements to consider when building your software. Additionally, we are publishing the OWASP Cornucopia Companion Edition that comes with 6 companion suits (see: https://cornucopia.owasp.org/edition/companion) covering new topics: Agentic AI (AAI), Automated Threats (BOT), Cloud (CLD), Frontend (FRE), Large Language Models (LLM), and DevOps (DVO). A suit in the companion deck may replace (or be used in addition to) suites in the existing Website Edition so that the players can add a specific focus to their threat modeling: For example, say you are building an LLM application and want to perform threat modeling specifically for LLM. You would then use the OWASP Cornucopia Website Edition and the LLM companion suite as your elected OWASP Cornucopia focus area.

What&#39;s more, it is now possible to create your OWASP Cornucopia Threat Model in OWASP Threat Dragon using their brand new EoP Games diagram. The diagram allows you to easily select the right card from the OWASP Cornucopia suite and connect it directly to your threat model in OWASP Threat Dragon, thanks to the combined efforts of volunteers at Universidad Católica del Uruguay and the OWASP Threat Dragon project.

All project leaders and contributors to the OWASP projects that have provided valuable input and guidance to OWASP Top 10, OWASP AISVS and the OWASP GenAI Security project. We also want to thank the people and contributors to Mitre&#39;s Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC™) and Atlas, together with CSA Cloud Controls Matrix, which are all used in the cross-references provided.

Failing to regularly assess your security isn&#39;t only costly; it can leave you vulnerable to threats. Several companies have implemented OWASP Cornucopia as part of their SDLC and use it for security requirements analysis, threat modeling, and secure design for every sprint and every user story. You should do the same! Don&#39;t let your business spiral out of control; consciously assess how you are doing by continuously threat-modeling your applications and infrastructure. To get started scaling your threat modeling efforts, OWASP Cornucopia v3.0 is the perfect tool.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:image href="https://static.media.ccc.de/media/events/god/2026/110763-af2068b9-f97b-45ed-8c07-1f3e9ae5fbd5.jpg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hackbots under control: Methodology for Autonomous Pentesters (god2026)</title>
      <link>https://media.ccc.de/v/god2026-110752-hackbots-under-control-me</link>
      <description>Autonomous pentesting tools have matured to the point where they can reliably find vulnerabilities, but finding vulnerabilities is not the same as doing a professional pentest. Bug bounty hunting optimizes for high-severity impact while a client engagement requires systematic coverage against a framework, with every control checked.

In this talk we will explore how we designed an internal solution that layers the OWASP ASVS framework on top of existing agentic testing products. We will cover what we put in place to get reliable results, the guardrails we designed to ensure safe behavior in client environments, and how our harness improves the coverage of agentic testing solutions.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</description>
      <enclosure url="https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110752-eng-Hackbots_under_control_Methodology_for_Autonomous_Pentesters_hd.mp4"
        length="160187464810496"
        type="video/mp4"/>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:20:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110752-eng-Hackbots_under_control_Methodology_for_Autonomous_Pentesters_hd.mp4?1790242661</guid>
      <dc:identifier>89354a50-d435-4899-ab5d-eb6e4a37150e</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2026-09-24T10:20:00+02:00</dc:date>
      <itunes:author>Tanguy Snoeck</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:keywords>110752, 2026, god2026, Saal Baden, god2026-eng, god2026, Day 1</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:summary>Autonomous pentesting tools have matured to the point where they can reliably find vulnerabilities, but finding vulnerabilities is not the same as doing a professional pentest. Bug bounty hunting optimizes for high-severity impact while a client engagement requires systematic coverage against a framework, with every control checked.

In this talk we will explore how we designed an internal solution that layers the OWASP ASVS framework on top of existing agentic testing products. We will cover what we put in place to get reliable results, the guardrails we designed to ensure safe behavior in client environments, and how our harness improves the coverage of agentic testing solutions.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:image href="https://static.media.ccc.de/media/events/god/2026/110752-89354a50-d435-4899-ab5d-eb6e4a37150e.jpg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agentic AI Gateway Enforcement of the OWASP Top 10 (god2026)</title>
      <link>https://media.ccc.de/v/god2026-110751-agentic-ai-gateway-enforc</link>
      <description>The OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 clearly outlines risks like prompt injection, tool misuse, excessive agency, rogue and compromised agents, and untraceable actions. This talk shows how an open source tool addresses the risks as a control platform, a switchboard between the model and its actions. The separation means any hostile or compromised model is bound and can&#39;t reach or bypass these controls.

    Tool misuse and excessive agency hit per-action permission tiers that auto-allow, require human approval, or block.
    Compromised and rogue agents hit a gate so an &quot;evil model&quot; can&#39;t elevate.
    Untraceable action hits an append-only, hash-chained, signed audit log.
    Skill supply chain hits a signature verification at load.

A live agent demo shows the risks, controls, source code, and design architecture. The reference implementation maps to the sovereignty posture the EU formalized in its June 2026 tech package.

Documentation and source: https://wirken.ai

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</description>
      <enclosure url="https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110751-eng-Agentic_AI_Gateway_Enforcement_of_the_OWASP_Top_10_hd.mp4"
        length="343794849415168"
        type="video/mp4"/>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:15:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110751-eng-Agentic_AI_Gateway_Enforcement_of_the_OWASP_Top_10_hd.mp4?1790241372</guid>
      <dc:identifier>dfb213c8-cf0b-4ff1-a932-76dba9b66521</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2026-09-24T10:15:00+02:00</dc:date>
      <itunes:author>Davi Ottenheimer</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:keywords>110751, 2026, god2026, Saal Baden, god2026-eng, god2026, Day 1</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:summary>The OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 clearly outlines risks like prompt injection, tool misuse, excessive agency, rogue and compromised agents, and untraceable actions. This talk shows how an open source tool addresses the risks as a control platform, a switchboard between the model and its actions. The separation means any hostile or compromised model is bound and can&#39;t reach or bypass these controls.

    Tool misuse and excessive agency hit per-action permission tiers that auto-allow, require human approval, or block.
    Compromised and rogue agents hit a gate so an &quot;evil model&quot; can&#39;t elevate.
    Untraceable action hits an append-only, hash-chained, signed audit log.
    Skill supply chain hits a signature verification at load.

A live agent demo shows the risks, controls, source code, and design architecture. The reference implementation maps to the sovereignty posture the EU formalized in its June 2026 tech package.

Documentation and source: https://wirken.ai

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:image href="https://static.media.ccc.de/media/events/god/2026/110751-dfb213c8-cf0b-4ff1-a932-76dba9b66521.jpg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding the Map of Threat Modeling Through the Lens of the TM-BOM (god2026)</title>
      <link>https://media.ccc.de/v/god2026-110762-understanding-the-map-of</link>
      <description>Threat models usually go out of date as soon as they are created. They reside on the tool used to create the threat model. So a developer without access to the threat modeling tool does not even open the threat model.

On the other hand, threat models that are interoperable come with several advantages. It&#39;s easier to share them with team members. Vendors can be asked to provide their threat models in a ready-to-consume format by purchasers in sensitive industries like healthcare. With the advent of agentic systems, LLMs can even consume raw threat models in JSON format and generate threat models that can be viewed and deliberated upon by human reviewers.

The CycloneDX project is pushing to release the TM-BOM (Threat Modeling Bill of Materials) and is targeting general availability later this year. This session discusses the nuts and bolts of the TM-BOM format. Participants will understand how various pieces like blueprints, business objectives, behaviors, threats, risks, use cases, and controls interact with each other.

To ground this standard in reality, I will share insights from integrating this pre-release schema into an open-source threat modeling platform, exploring the friction points of translating complex data structures into human-centric visualizations.

Outline (20 Minutes)

The Interoperability Problem (3 mins): Why siloed threat models fail developers and compliance teams.

Deconstructing the TM-BOM (7 mins): A focused look at the CycloneDX 2.0 schema and how its core components (Blueprints, Behaviors, Threats, Risks, Controls) interlock.

Agents and the TM-BOM (5 mins): How standardizing into JSON unlocks the ability for agentic systems to reliably consume and generate models for human review.

Implementation Realities (3 mins): Engineering lessons learned mapping a complex JSON standard to visual diagrams.

Q&amp;A (2 mins)

Attendees will leave with a functional understanding of the upcoming CycloneDX 2.0 standard, the operational benefits of interoperable threat models, and how to prepare their security pipelines to generate and consume TM-BOMs.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</description>
      <enclosure url="https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110762-eng-Understanding_the_Map_of_Threat_Modeling_Through_the_Lens_of_the_TM-BOM_hd.mp4"
        length="220834071314432"
        type="video/mp4"/>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:55:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110762-eng-Understanding_the_Map_of_Threat_Modeling_Through_the_Lens_of_the_TM-BOM_hd.mp4?1790241243</guid>
      <dc:identifier>f3cc36ee-f906-4095-a5bb-709c9bfc1c6a</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2026-09-24T09:55:00+02:00</dc:date>
      <itunes:author>Vikramaditya Narayan</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:keywords>110762, 2026, god2026, Saal Fidelitas, god2026-eng, god2026, Day 1</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:summary>Threat models usually go out of date as soon as they are created. They reside on the tool used to create the threat model. So a developer without access to the threat modeling tool does not even open the threat model.

On the other hand, threat models that are interoperable come with several advantages. It&#39;s easier to share them with team members. Vendors can be asked to provide their threat models in a ready-to-consume format by purchasers in sensitive industries like healthcare. With the advent of agentic systems, LLMs can even consume raw threat models in JSON format and generate threat models that can be viewed and deliberated upon by human reviewers.

The CycloneDX project is pushing to release the TM-BOM (Threat Modeling Bill of Materials) and is targeting general availability later this year. This session discusses the nuts and bolts of the TM-BOM format. Participants will understand how various pieces like blueprints, business objectives, behaviors, threats, risks, use cases, and controls interact with each other.

To ground this standard in reality, I will share insights from integrating this pre-release schema into an open-source threat modeling platform, exploring the friction points of translating complex data structures into human-centric visualizations.

Outline (20 Minutes)

The Interoperability Problem (3 mins): Why siloed threat models fail developers and compliance teams.

Deconstructing the TM-BOM (7 mins): A focused look at the CycloneDX 2.0 schema and how its core components (Blueprints, Behaviors, Threats, Risks, Controls) interlock.

Agents and the TM-BOM (5 mins): How standardizing into JSON unlocks the ability for agentic systems to reliably consume and generate models for human review.

Implementation Realities (3 mins): Engineering lessons learned mapping a complex JSON standard to visual diagrams.

Q&amp;A (2 mins)

Attendees will leave with a functional understanding of the upcoming CycloneDX 2.0 standard, the operational benefits of interoperable threat models, and how to prepare their security pipelines to generate and consume TM-BOMs.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:image href="https://static.media.ccc.de/media/events/god/2026/110762-f3cc36ee-f906-4095-a5bb-709c9bfc1c6a.jpg"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Keynote (god2026)</title>
      <link>https://media.ccc.de/v/god2026-110750-keynote</link>
      <description>AI is creating real breakthroughs, but also an ocean of slop, hype, fear, and confusion. Engineers are declared obsolete. Agentic AI is treated as magic. Security teams are asked to protect systems that are changing faster than their risk models. No wonder many of us feel dazed.

This keynote offers a free therapy session for the AI-overwhelmed, including a grounded path through the chaos from your therapist. What are the truths we can rely on? Which AI risks matter most? How do we scope security concerns without drowning in them? And what about our careers?

Bring your questions. There will be tissues.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</description>
      <enclosure url="https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110750-eng-Keynote_hd.mp4"
        length="702804291223552"
        type="video/mp4"/>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:05:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://cdn.media.ccc.de/events/god/2026/h264-hd/god2026-110750-eng-Keynote_hd.mp4?1790239473</guid>
      <dc:identifier>5f4583b8-b579-4c38-9771-e4e2e0eb9ac4</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2026-09-24T09:05:00+02:00</dc:date>
      <itunes:author>Rob van der Veer</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:keywords>110750, 2026, god2026, Saal Baden, god2026-eng, god2026, Day 1</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:summary>AI is creating real breakthroughs, but also an ocean of slop, hype, fear, and confusion. Engineers are declared obsolete. Agentic AI is treated as magic. Security teams are asked to protect systems that are changing faster than their risk models. No wonder many of us feel dazed.

This keynote offers a free therapy session for the AI-overwhelmed, including a grounded path through the chaos from your therapist. What are the truths we can rely on? Which AI risks matter most? How do we scope security concerns without drowning in them? And what about our careers?

Bring your questions. There will be tissues.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://c3voc.de
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:image href="https://static.media.ccc.de/media/events/god/2026/110750-5f4583b8-b579-4c38-9771-e4e2e0eb9ac4.jpg"/>
    </item>
    <generator>media.ccc.de / RSS 0.3.3</generator>
    <itunes:category text="Technology"/>
    <itunes:image href="https://static.media.ccc.de/media/events/god/2026/logo.png"/>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>CCC media team</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>media@c3voc.de</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:author>CCC media team</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>CCC Congress Hacking Security Netzpolitik</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:subtitle>A wide variety of video material distributed by the CCC. All content is taken from cdn.media.ccc.de and media.ccc.de</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:summary>A wide variety of video material distributed by the Chaos Computer Club. This feed contains all events from god2026 as mp4</itunes:summary>
  </channel>
</rss>